Overview

Basics

Basics
Quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides) forest communities in the Lake Tahoe Basin are undergoing succession to conifers that impact aspen vigor and stifle natural regeneration. Removal of conifers from aspen stands is undertaken around the Lake Tahoe Basin. However, little is known about stocking and treatment persistence: specifically, how much growing space must be provided to aspen trees and their root sucker regeneration for vigorous growth to be sustained until the next restorative thinning. The report introduces the Aspen Stocking Assessment Model and provides examples of its use in simulating aspen conifer stand development before and after restorative thinning.

Completed
2009
2010
2013
$147,801

Kat McIntyre (KMcIntyre@trpa.gov)
10/30/2017
10/30/2017
To zoom, hold down the Shift key and drag a rectangle.
Location Information Location Notes

Organizations

EIP Details

EIP Basics

04.01.01.0106 - P051: Stocking Guidelines for Aspen Restoration: Predicting Treatment Persistence After Successive Conifer Removals

Performance Measures

Expected Performance Measures

Expected Performance Measures

No expected performance measures set for this project.

Reported Performance Measures

Reported Performance Measures

No annual performance measure accomplishments entered for this project.

Funding

Expected Funding

Expected Funding
$147,801
$147,801
$0

Total
Southern Nevada Public Land Management Act (Pacific Southwest Research Station) (USFS - PSW) $147,801 $147,801 $0
Grand Total $147,801 $147,801 $0

Reported Expenditures

Reported Expenditures
Total 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009
Southern Nevada Public Land Management Act (Pacifi... $147,801 $29,560 $29,561 $29,560 $29,560 $29,560
Grand Total $147,801 $29,560 $29,561 $29,560 $29,560 $29,560

Photos

Photos

No photos available.

Other Details

Watersheds

No watersheds set for this project.

Threshold Categories

  • Quaking aspen forest communities in the Lake Tahoe Basin are being encroached and out-competed by conifers that impact aspen vigor and stifle natural regeneration. Removal of conifers has been advocated, and  is being tested around the Tahoe Basin. 

Local and Regional Plans

No Local and Regional Plans set for this project.

Related Projects

Related Projects

No Related Projects set for this project.

External Links

No external links entered.

Notes

Notes
10/30/2017 1:15 PM Matt Driscoll Match Funding: $ 43,249 
07/25/2017 9:43 PM Kiara Cuerpo-Hadsall Objectives:

This report introduces the Aspen Stocking Assessment Model and provides examples of its use in simulating aspen-conifer stand development before and after restorative thinning. Tree data collected in 2 1/2 acre (one hectare) plots around the Lake Tahoe Basin were used to initiate the model. Different diameter-limit thinning prescriptions (i.e., cut all conifer below a defined size) were simulated by removing records for smaller (cut) trees from the plot data and then recalculating density and average tree size for input into the Aspen Stocking Assessment Model. This approach ensured that model simulations were based on realistic pre- and post-thinning values.

07/25/2017 9:33 PM Kiara Cuerpo-Hadsall Findings:

• The Aspen Stocking Assessment Model forecasted a 15-year treatment persistence, after which time the stand had returned to pre-treatment stand density index (SDI), and a second thinning was scheduled. For the second treatment, we compared three alternatives: 20, 24, or 30 in. (50, 60, or 75 cm) DBH limit thinning, and again forecast growth of each tree species using the Aspen Stocking Assessment Model. These treatments had 23-, 29- and 40-year persistence, respectively. The heaviest thinning treatment generated ~28 US short tons ac-1 (~64 metric tons ha-1) of dry cut wood.

• Treatment persistence, defined here as the time taken for stands to return to their pre-treatment crowding levels, varied according to pretreatment stand density, species composition, and thinning intensity.

• The Aspen Stocking Assessment Model indicated that 36 years after the 24-inch DBH limit thinning, once the stand had again exceeded pre-treatment SDI, the new cohort of regenerating conifers collectively represented only 14% of stand density; the remainder being aspen or large residual conifers that had grown larger than 30 in. (75 cm) DBH.

*** See www.fs.fed.us/PSW/partnerships/tahoescience for additional findings.

07/25/2017 9:32 PM Kiara Cuerpo-Hadsall Management Implications:

The Aspen Stocking Assessment Model is a flexible, transparent spreadsheet-based model that allows the user to schedule restoration thinning and ‘grow’ aspen-conifer stands forward in time, before and after multiple thinning treatments.

07/25/2017 9:32 PM Kiara Cuerpo-Hadsall Publications:

Berrill, J. P., & Dagley, C. M. 2012. Geographic patterns and stand variables influencing growth and vigor of Populus tremuloides in the Sierra Nevada (USA). International Scholarly Research Notices, 2012.

Berrill, J. P., & Dagley, C. M. 2014. Regeneration and Recruitment Correlate with Stand Density and Composition in Long-Unburned Aspen Stands Undergoing Succession to Conifer in the Sierra Nevada, USA. Forest Res, 3(119), 2.